top of page

The Legend Of Queen Esther

BY WILLIAM C. KASHATUS(CORRESPONDENT)

Published: July 1, 2012

 

Just off Susquehanna Avenue in Wyoming, in a quiet residential neighborhood between Seventh and Eighth streets, there lies beneath the ground a large boulder, barely visible through a steel cage. A small plaque bearing the words: "Upon this rock, the Indian Queen Esther slaughtered the Brave Patriots taken in the Battle of July 3, 1778."

 

The plaque, placed there by the local chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution in 1895, marks the site where Esther Montour, a mixed blood Indian, angered by the death of her son after the July 3, 1778 Battle of Wyoming, is said to have smashed the skulls of 14 or more captured American militiamen with her maul.

 

While the steel cage may discourage souvenir hunters from chiseling off a piece of the rock, it also piques the curiosity of those who stumble across it.

Historians still speculate over identification of the Indian woman who committed the gruesome act more than two centuries ago. As a result, the "Bloody Rock" incident has, over time, evolved from a stirring historical account tied to the birth of our nation to a local legend based on myth, hearsay and sparse documentation.

 

Nevertheless, Esther Montour and the "Bloody Rock" incident continue to fascinate the public to the present day. The origins of the Wyoming Massacre and the "Bloody Rock" incident can be traced to the 18th-century alliance between the British and the Iroquois Confederation, consisting of the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca and Tuscarora nations.

Commanding the headwaters of the Hudson, Delaware and Susquehanna rivers as well as the long finger lakes of New York, the Iroquois were critical to the success of British efforts to secure its North American colonial empire against the French. To this end, Sir William Johnson, an English diplomat, won the trust of the Iroquois, who helped the British defeat France during the French and Indian War.

The Iroquois remained loyal to England during the American Revolution. In 1777, British General John Burgoyne led a campaign to gain control of the Hudson River, but was defeated by the Continental Army at the Battle of Saratoga. News of Burgoyne's surrender prompted France to enter the war as an American ally.

Concerned that the French might attempt to retake parts of North America, the British adopted a defensive stance in Quebec and recruited Loyalists and Indians to engage in a frontier war along the northern and western borders of the fledgling United States.

British Colonel John Butler recruited a regiment of Loyalists for the effort, while Seneca chiefs Sayenqueraghta and Cornplanter enlisted the members of their tribes. In addition, Joseph Brant, a mixed blood who had graduated from Dartmouth College, recruited Mohawks for the guerrilla war against frontier settlers.

General George Washington, commander of the Continental Army, also tried to recruit the Iroquois, primarily as a diversionary tactic to engage the British in Quebec while his army concentrated its efforts in the Middle-Atlantic region. But Washington succeeded only in attracting the Oneidas and Tuscaroras to the American side.

By April 1778 the Seneca were raiding American settlements on the Allegheny and Susquehanna rivers. In early June, Butler, his regiment of Rangers, and the Seneca decided to attack the Wyoming Valley while Brant and the Mohawks would raid communities further north.Butler's 400 Rangers and 700 of their Iroquois allies arrived in the Wyoming Valley on June 30. Since most of the able-bodied men were away serving with the Continental Army, the defense of the region was left to the Connecticut militia, mostly old men and boys who had settled in the area a decade earlier.

 

On July 1, Butler sent a surrender summons to the militia which was holed up inside Fort Wintermoot. Terms were arranged that the patriot soldiers, after surrendering the fort with all their arms and stores, would be released on the condition that they would not again bear arms during the war.

Two days later, the British saw that the American militia was gathering in great numbers outside of Forty Fort, preparing to go on the offensive. While the patriots were still a mile away, Butler set up an ambush and directed that Fort Wintermoot be set on fire. The Americans, thinking this was a retreat, advanced rapidly. Butler instructed the Seneca to lie flat on the ground to avoid observation. When the Americans advanced to within 100 hundred yards of the Rangers, they fired three times. The Seneca came out of their positions, fired a volley, and attacked the patriots in close combat.

The so-called "Battle of Wyoming" lasted no more than 45 minutes. An order to reposition the patriot line turned into a frantic rout when the inexperienced militia panicked. This action ended the battle and triggered the Iroquois hunt for survivors.

Only 60 of the Americans managed to escape, and only five were taken prisoner. The Iroquois killed and tortured an unknown number of prisoners and fleeing soldiers. Colonel Zebulon Butler, who led the Connecticut militia into battle, reported that 227 American scalps were taken. If true, Wyoming was the worst Indian massacre in Pennsylvania's history.

According to eye-witness accounts, Queen Esther Montour was "the most infuriated demon in the carnival of blood," having tortured and killed more than 14 American soldiers who were trying to escape the bloody slaughter. She "danced around a rock" upon which the captives were held, and with "a maul and tomahawk smashed their skulls." Her motive, according to these accounts, was to "seek revenge for the recent death of her son" at the hands of the Connecticut militia.

The following day, Esther was supposedly "seen riding astride a stolen horse," wearing multiple layers of "stolen clothing," and "carrying in her hand a string of scalps." She later boasted, "I was never so tired as yesterday from killing so many damn Yankees." While these inflammatory accounts reflect the negative stereotype of Native Americans as "savage" and "inhumane," inconsistencies of the various eye-witnesses, as well as the circumstantial evidence of Esther Montour's alleged role in the Wyoming Massacre, cast serious doubt about her involvement in the atrocity.

It's questionable, for example, that Esther Montour was actually the brutal murderer depicted by the families and friends of white victims. Other contemporaries describe her as a "kind-hearted" woman.

Born about 1720 at Sheshequin (present-day Green's Landing, New York), Montour was a descendant of several mixed marriages between white settlers and Native Americans. As a result of her ability to transcend cultural differences, Esther maintained close relations with both white and Indian cultures. Like her relative, Madame Catherine Montour - with whom she is often confused - Esther was employed by colonial governments as a translator or interpreter in negotiations with the Iroquois. As a sign of respect, the British gave her the title, "Queen."

There are also several contemporary references to Queen Esther's friendship with, defense of and regular visits to her non-Indian neighbors. According to those accounts, Esther possessed "proper Christian beliefs" and was "loyal to both Indians and the English." On one occasion, she aided in the escape of two white settlers when she learned that the warriors of her tribe were planning to kill them.

Other contemporary descriptions of Queen Esther's appearance at the Wyoming Massacre are inconsistent. Some accounts describe her as a "large, heavy-built woman" while others claim she was "tall and slim." Similarly, Esther was described as being "meticulously neat by nature," which casts serious doubt over the account of her appearance wearing multiple hats and layers of clothes.

There are also inconsistencies about her behavior during the event. There's disagreement, for example, on how well she spoke English, some saying she was multilingual and "spoke English excellently," while others claim she could "barely speak" the language. In addition, some claimed that she "demanded and consumed a vast amount of whiskey" at Forty Fort, while most other early accounts contend that Esther did not drink or tolerate those who did.

Finally, there's considerable circumstantial evidence that Queen Esther may not have been present at all during the Wyoming Massacre. Although she may have reflected leadership abilities as a liaison between the white and Indian cultures, it was highly unusual for a female to assume the role of an Iroquois warrior.

The Iroquois were matrilineal, meaning that an individual inherited certain rights and privileges through his or her mother. Women were regarded with respect, and their advice and counsel were considered in all matters relating to the community. But men usually served as leaders, especially in military and political affairs.

If Queen Esther assumed a leadership role among Native Americans, it might have come through her status as the widow of a Delaware chief named Eghobund. When Eghobund died in 1772, Esther inherited the sole leadership of the Munsees, her deceased husband's tribe. Still, this would not explain her role as a military leader - or warrior - among the Iroquois.

There is also the question of chronology. Most eye-witness accounts attribute Queen Esther's rage to the death of her son, Andrew, who was killed at Exeter on the afternoon of July 2, 1778.

But other contemporary accounts place her at Sheshequin in Upstate New York on that date. If true, it is highly doubtful that Esther could have traveled to the Wyoming Valley using the primitive means of transportation at her disposal to take part in the Massacre.

In addition, the identity of Andrew as Esther's son is doubtful. The only record of an "Andrew Montour" is the son of Madame Catherine Montour, either the grandmother or aunt of Esther. Thus, Andrew was Esther's uncle or cousin; not her son. And he was murdered in the Ohio Valley by a Seneca in 1772; not in the Wyoming Valley on July 2, 1778.

Some accounts contend that she was killed by Colonel Thomas Hartley's men when they burned her village on Sept. 27, 1778. Other accounts maintain that she was killed by Major General John Sullivan's Continental regiment near Tioga Point, New York, as part of a scorched earth campaign to put an end to Iroquois and attacks against American frontier settlements. Still other eyewitnesses insist that she lived in a village on the eastern shore of Lake Cayuga where she died peacefully as late as 1790.

Regardless of her demise, Queen Esther Montour's legend continues to fascinate and horrify residents and visitors of the Wyoming Valley.

William Kashatus teaches history at Luzerne County Community College. He can be reached at Bkashatus@luzerne.edu.

 

Queen Esther -- Indian friend of fiend?

 

by Guy Abell, Guest Columnist

 

Queen Esther enters the picture. The defenders were routed, and Queen Esther, angered by the recent death of her son, lined 16 American colonists around a huge stone, since known as Bloody Rock, and personally smashed their skulls with her tomahawk. A handful of captives somehow escaped, but the total casualties were indeed high, with two-thirds of the defenders killed, resulting in many widows and orphans. Supposedly, 227 scalps were taken by the Indians, and turned in to the British for $10 per scalp. If true, this was the worst massacre in Pennsylvania history.

 

Several accounts of the massacre exist that claim that Esther was indeed the villain. As a consequence, Esther is referred to by early historical accounts, supposedly based on eyewitness accounts, in the most negative terms. For example she is described as "the fiend of the Susquehanna," "the most infamous of all monsters" and "the most infuriated demon in the carnival of blood," some of the terms used to describe Queen Esther's cruelty. Along the same lines, Indians were usually described negatively, in early accounts as joyfully consuming the flesh of dogs before battle and wearing horrible war paint, and of course, they were always pictured as savage and inhumane.

Several accounts quote Esther as saying, "I was never so tired as yesterday from killing so many damn Yankees." She was also described as "seen riding astride a stolen horse on a stolen side saddle, place hind end forward, with 7 bonnets, one upon another upon her head, with all the clothing she could continue to get on, and overall wearing a scarlet riding cloak, carrying in her hand a string of scalps from the slaughtered friends of those who were witness of her savage brutality."

 

Inflammatory language like this is perhaps understandable if the "facts" are true, and the terrible deeds did occur. There is somehow, some doubt, and hindsight clearly shows a lot of exaggeration of claims in many of the early accounts.

For example, descriptions of Esther at the Wyoming Massacre do not completely match each other, or match other descriptions of Esther's appearance. Some accounts describe her as a large, heavy-built woman, while others claim she was tall and slim. There is also disagreement on how well she spoke English, some saying she was multilingual and spoke English excellently, while others claim she could barely speak the language. There is certainly doubt that she ever spoke the words about being to tired from killing so many.

There is also a question of whether she could have been at the Wyoming Massacre. The theory is that rage over the death of her son Andrew spurred her awful actions. He was killed at Exeter in the afternoon of July 2, 1778. Queen Esther was supposed to have been at Queen Esther's Town (Sheshequin) on that date. Could she have made it to the Wyoming Valley using the primitive transportation of the time and carried out the slaughter? Some claim that, going by canoe, and giving her every benefit of the doubt, it would have taken at least 36 hours to get there, and yet, she was supposedly bashing out the brains of her victims a mere 27 hours later. If this is true, she could not have been at Bloody Rock in time.

She has also been described as being meticulously neat by nature, and that throws doubt on the description of her appearance of wearing multiple hats and layers of clothes. It is also claimed the woman demanded and consumed a vast amount of whiskey at Forty Fort, and all other early accounts maintain that Esther did not drink or tolerate those who did.

 

However, there is no doubt a woman described as a squaw was there, and did commit atrocities. Perhaps the cause was revenge for the death of a beloved son, or rage over the policy of ethnic cleansing and Indian genocide that was common at the time, or even excessive alcoholism. There is no way to know for sure. Using today's standards, reasonable doubt seems like a fair verdict!

However, justice in the 1780s didn't want reasonable doubt to prevail. A military force, under the command of Co. Thomas Hartley was created, and started up the Susquehanna River to Tioga Point. With much hardship and difficulty, the 200-man force faced heavy rain, flooded streams, and occasional Indians. They killed several Indians near Canton (Sept. 26), almost caught another group at Leroy, and then rescued 15 prisoners in Sheshequin.

 

Part of the force went to Tioga to Queen Esther's Flats and burned and totally destroyed the village on Sept. 27 or 28, 1778.

The Executive Council of Pennsylvania passed a resolution thanking Hartley's troops for their successful mission. Queen Esther is believed to have escaped, possibly to Esther's Glen near Wilawana. It is said she later married a Tuscarora chief named Steel Trap and moved north with him to Cayuga Lake. There are some reports, largely discounted, that she was killed by colonial troops.

The attitude of the time was that the Wyoming Massacre and the violence that followed closed any further attempts at peaceful arbitration with the Native Americans. General Sullivan's March the following year pretty much removed any further Indian threats to Northeastern Pennsylvania. General Washington directed General Sullivan and others to "carry the war into the heart of the country of the Six Nations, to cut off their settlements, destroy next year's crop, and do them every other mischief which time and circumstance permit." That was indeed done, but that is another story.

© 2011 by DeadLine Paranormal. Web design proudly created by Jim Fazzi

bottom of page